F-117 to be retired

Discuss the tactics and strategy of operating your own personal mercenary air squadron. Pilots, to your planes!
Post Reply
User avatar
Charles Lewis
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 937
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2007 3:58 am
Location: Des Moines, IA
Contact:

F-117 to be retired

Post by Charles Lewis »

http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5iTsE ... wD8VB438G0

According to the article, one of the motivations to retire the F-117 is to free up funds for the F-22.
'Fear God and dread nought'
Coat of Arms motto of Baron Fisher, of Kilverstone
User avatar
echoco
Commander
Commander
Posts: 128
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 11:08 am

Post by echoco »

Haha I was wondering how long it'll take them to come down to this. I thought they'd go for the F-15s first, with the accidents and everything.
User avatar
Charles Lewis
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 937
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2007 3:58 am
Location: Des Moines, IA
Contact:

Post by Charles Lewis »

I'm sure they'd like to, but they have too many to cheaply replace with something else. I think the article said there were only 54 F-117s built total.
'Fear God and dread nought'
Coat of Arms motto of Baron Fisher, of Kilverstone
User avatar
MarkG88
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 737
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 4:25 am
Location: Ohio

Post by MarkG88 »

Charles Lewis wrote:I'm sure they'd like to, but they have too many to cheaply replace with something else. I think the article said there were only 54 F-117s built total.
JDAMS, armed UAVs, and yes, the F-22 (briefly until the F-35 gets produced eventually) made the F-117 obsolete. Its short legs, light payload and large logistics tail (due to the first generation stealth) make it prime candidate for chopping block.

The powers that be (former fighter jocks) in USAF won't be in hurry to retire F-15C anytime soon although they're using it's supposed high attrition rate due to GWOT as fodder for the F-22s propaganda machine.
User avatar
MarkG88
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 737
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 4:25 am
Location: Ohio

Post by MarkG88 »

Here is another article on the F-117 retirement from strategypage.com.

http://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htairf ... 80313.aspx

-Mark
User avatar
echoco
Commander
Commander
Posts: 128
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 11:08 am

Post by echoco »

59 build
7 lost
10 retired

leaves 42 or less, how many F-22 would that pay for, anyone knows?

costs of F-22
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ ... 2-cost.htm
User avatar
Charles Lewis
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 937
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2007 3:58 am
Location: Des Moines, IA
Contact:

Post by Charles Lewis »

The F-117s aren't being sold, but placed into storage. However, that means ground crews that can be retrained to the F-22 and experienced stealth pilots to add to the program. Further, the Air Force wouldn't have to buy more spare parts of the F-117s. Don't know if that translates directly into more purchases, but would make it easier to support the new program.
'Fear God and dread nought'
Coat of Arms motto of Baron Fisher, of Kilverstone
User avatar
MarkG88
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 737
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 4:25 am
Location: Ohio

Post by MarkG88 »

echoco wrote:59 build
7 lost
10 retired

leaves 42 or less, how many F-22 would that pay for, anyone knows?

costs of F-22
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ ... 2-cost.htm
Since it was a "black" program, no price tag has every publicly been mentioned for the F-117 as far as I know, but I'd say you could get maybe six F-22s for the lot of 42 Nighthawks :wink: (had to deduct for "high mileage" and so forth hehe).

Don't get me wrong, I am a big fan of the F-22 (it's 200-1 or so in simulated air-to-air combat last I was able to find out) but current block editions of F-15E and F-16 also do very well (and there are hundreds of F-15Es and over 1,000 "modern" F-16s). And with less than 200 F-22s planned to be built.......I want my Eagles and Falcons around for a bit (ANG and AF Reserve units will still have them for a long time to come methinks).
Post Reply