Defensive Scenarios

Blue? Green? Red? Refuse? It's time to talk about rules for a new community edition of the VBAM rules!
Post Reply
User avatar
Tyrel Lohr
Vice Admiral
Vice Admiral
Posts: 1466
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2007 3:48 am
Location: Lusk, WY
Contact:

Defensive Scenarios

Post by Tyrel Lohr »

In Defensive scenarios, we have a few options for handling bases and minefields. Here is what I'm leaning towards for Galaxies:
  • Bases and minefields can only be used in Defensive scenarios (unless a Minelayer is carrying mines, at which point they are deployed like flights).
  • Bases are treated like ships and they can even serve as a task force flagship. This replicates Babylon 5 and Deep Space Nine commanding a fleet in battle.
  • Bases and minefields start at formation level 0, which allows for free directed damage, because they are immobile and cannot maneuver
  • Minefields do not have a command cost and do not count against a task force's command limit. The number of minefields present in the battle is instead equal to the number of ships (1:1 protection)

Does that all sound reasonable, or are there any other elements that we should consider? Minefields become throwaway defenses that, while powerful, have limited usefulness in space combat scenarios and are more useful as strategic weapons to prevent an enemy from pushing deeper into your space (as each minefield counts as a ship for the purposes of contested movement).

Bases meanwhile become overgrown (+50% CP) ships that are more powerful but can only be used in Defensive scenarios. They're great command linchpins in those kinds of defensive fleet actions, however, and allow the defender to field a pretty substantial warfleet.

The question does become whether there should be a limit to the number of bases that can be included in the task force at once. Something similar to the one-third rule may be necessary, so that a player has to have some ships (if available) in the task force and not use cheap bases to completely shield them.

This could be a pain point for the single squadron task force rules, as dealing with assaults against systems with high CR starbases could become one-sided meat grinders unless the attacker also has a solid command ship. Then again, historically players have built very few fixed defenses, preferring to rely on mobile fleet units, and if you encounter a single large starbase here or there it shouldn't be too unbalanced. The attacker is just going to suffer much higher attrition from having a "narrower" battle line.
[i]"Touch not the pylons, for they are the messengers!"[/i]
User avatar
BroAdso
Commander
Commander
Posts: 183
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 4:27 am
Location: Richmond, VA

Re: Defensive Scenarios

Post by BroAdso »

I rather like these solutions. The complex way mines could be used to add to formations were something that was easy to forget under 2E, and the 1/3 rule for deploying defenses also seemed...odd. These changes do away with these unusual and non-streamlined rules, and work well.
Post Reply