X-box aces replace real pilots

Off-Topic Discussion
Post Reply

Who do you prefer running the UAV's of the present and future? Officers and gentleman (the Hap Arnold doctrine for pilots from WWII) or NCOs (the current Army way)? Please feel free to comment as well after voting.

Officers and gentleman, because that is how the US Air Force really wants it.
2
17%
NCOs because if it's good enough for the Special Forces, then it ought to be good enough for UAV jockies.
10
83%
 
Total votes: 12

User avatar
MarkG88
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 737
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 4:25 am
Location: Ohio

X-box aces replace real pilots

Post by MarkG88 »

More fodder on the UAV front.

-Mark

ATTRITION: Desperately Seeking Cylon Minders

September 24, 2008: The U.S. Air Force is scrambling to supply enough operators for its growing fleet of UAVs. They now have over a hundred Predator and Reaper UAVs in service, as well as over a dozen Global Hawks. To that end, ten percent of recent graduates from pilot schools will spend three years operating UAVs, before going on to flying manned aircraft. In addition, the air force is experimenting with training non-flying officers to be UAV operators. Many of these officers could have been pilots, but were prevented from doing so because of physical limitations (poor eyesight or inability to handle the gyrations of aircraft). The air force has long insisted that UAV operators already be manned aircraft pilots, and allowed most of them to spend only three years operating UAVs before returning to manned aircraft. This has limited the number of UAV operators available.

The army uses NCOs trained specifically for UAV operation. The army has no operator shortage. The air force has recently made UAV operator a career field, not a temporary assignment (as it had been for years). The air force is also beginning to train non-pilot officers to be UAV operators, and is under pressure (both from within, and outside, the air force) to allow NCOs to be career UAV operators.

A typical Predator crew consists of an pilot and a sensor operator. Because the Predator stays in the air for so long, more than one crew is often used for each sortie. Crew shortages sometimes result in Predators being brought back to base before their fuel is used up.

There is also help on the way from the developers of flight control software. Many UAVs can fly quite well without any pilot at all. This is basically an adaptation of "automatic pilot" systems (which are now mostly software and sensors) that are now capable of doing practically all the flying for commercial aircraft. So it was no big jump to install these systems in UAVs and let them go cylon. Well, OK, not completely robotic, and certainly not self-aware. But Global Hawk UAVs are sent across the oceans on automatic (including take-offs and landings. Using more of these systems for Predator and Reaper, eliminates a lot of the human error problems. This solution has been a trend in aircraft and automobile design for over two decades.

Meanwhile, crew and satellite bandwidth shortages mean that only about 30 Predators and Reapers can be in the air at the same time. But that number is increasing, and the pilot shortage will remain until the air force has enough career UAV operators available.

For the first eight months of this year, Predators and Reapers flew over 4,400 sorties, each lasting, on average, about 18 hours. Each sortie resulted in finding about two targets. About 12 percent of those sorties were in direct support of ground troops under fire, and about 22 percent were in support of ground troops engaged in raids.
User avatar
echoco
Commander
Commander
Posts: 128
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 11:08 am

Post by echoco »

Which service operated them more effectively say from July 2006-2008? I'm curious as to who, pilots or specialist NCOs did better or the same.

Edit: deleted a question answered in your other thread
User avatar
MarkG88
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 737
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 4:25 am
Location: Ohio

Post by MarkG88 »

They're doing different missions and that's the way it'll go in future. Basically each brigade wants and needs its own UAVs for instant recon instead of the up through "division-corps-theater-air force-wing-squadron" chain of not quite communication that's always going to bottleneck stuff.

My point is, it no longer takes a "top gun" do to some of this stuff, a long term professional, whatever his or her rank, is going to do the job and do it well. This will continue to rankle the feathers of the old school top gun guys for a decade or so though (until the fad away).

-Mark
Post Reply