Extended Construction Times

Blue? Green? Red? Refuse? It's time to talk about rules for a new community edition of the VBAM rules!
Post Reply

Do you normally use construction times in your campaigns?

Yes
5
71%
No
2
29%
 
Total votes: 7

User avatar
Tyrel Lohr
Vice Admiral
Vice Admiral
Posts: 1466
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2007 3:48 am
Location: Lusk, WY
Contact:

Extended Construction Times

Post by Tyrel Lohr »

How many players use the 1E Extended Construction Time rules that were made standard in 2E? I know Jay and I always seemed to use at least some version of them. I did the Construction Cost / 2, and he often used the straight Construction Cost = # of turns to build (especially in his Wing Commander games).

The original 1E rules just assumed that you built everything immediately for the sake of ease of play. But reading through some of the old drafts made me wonder what preference other players had.
[i]"Touch not the pylons, for they are the messengers!"[/i]
wadewan
Ensign
Ensign
Posts: 21
Joined: Sun May 22, 2016 3:17 am
Location: On a Washington Beach

Re: Extended Construction Times

Post by wadewan »

Probably alone on this but my construction times are comparable to today's current naval build times of 1-3 years depending on vessel size in my campaign.
User avatar
murtalianconfederacy
Captain
Captain
Posts: 363
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2007 9:17 am
Location: Aboard the MCS Bavoralkin

Re: Extended Construction Times

Post by murtalianconfederacy »

(neo-Luddite here :D)

I always went without construction times for two main reasons:

1) Sometimes I had a break of a couple of days between turns, and a ship building sometimes got lost. There were plenty of times in my campaigns that I lost ships (or had more ships than there should be) without construction times, and construction times would have made this worse.

2) I never really got when the ships were completed (a curious blindspot but it was there). Let's use an example 8EP CA with orders to build on 2500.12, with build time of 4 turns:

2500.12: ship ordered
2501.01: 1/4
2501.02: 2/4
2501.03: 3/4
2501.04: 4/4

Now here's the confusion. Some of the campaign diaries I read (typically yours, Tyrel :) ) had the ship the next turn just say "Example CA (c)", and then the next turn it was moved into a fleet. So, carrying from the previous example, it would say:

2501.05: (c)
2501.06: ship moved to Home Fleet

Does this mean the ship is ready to move/fight, etc., in 2501.05, or 2501.06?
Not every laser dot has a loaded gun at the end of it
User avatar
Tyrel Lohr
Vice Admiral
Vice Admiral
Posts: 1466
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2007 3:48 am
Location: Lusk, WY
Contact:

Re: Extended Construction Times

Post by Tyrel Lohr »

It looks like the Luddites are winning, so I wouldn't be too concerned :)

As for the example there, murtalian, the construction advancement occurs during the Construction Phase each turn, so it should go something like this:

2500.12: ship ordered, 1/4
2501.01: 2/4
2501.02: 3/4
2501.03: 4/4, completed during Construction Phase and ready for orders next turn

But I could definitely see pushing construction times back to the optional rules if not enough players really used them, or if they just found them confusing.
[i]"Touch not the pylons, for they are the messengers!"[/i]
User avatar
aelius
Commander
Commander
Posts: 103
Joined: Sat Sep 18, 2010 1:51 am

Re: Extended Construction Times

Post by aelius »

I like construction times and typically use the extended.
It makes large ships more valuable. After all, you not only have to invest resources but shipyard time as well. Makes those capital ships something you don't want to lose.
If its just money then losing them becomes much less painful.
4. Killing is not too good for my enemies
Evil Overlords Survival Guide
Post Reply