Federation Admiral Public Update

Other Source Material and Settings
terryoc
Lieutenant
Lieutenant
Posts: 44
Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2008 9:25 am

Post by terryoc »

Ooooh, is it beautiful and suitably epic?
It is definitely beautiful.
But is it epic? This is VBAM! It must be EPIC! :wink: :D
Shadow Warrior
Commander
Commander
Posts: 113
Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2008 2:40 pm

Post by Shadow Warrior »

Yes, yes, and it must feature flaming death and everything, all on a totally epic scale, with a glowing nebula in the background. And a black hole. And no less that 250 starships.

:D
User avatar
Charles Lewis
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 937
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2007 3:58 am
Location: Des Moines, IA
Contact:

Post by Charles Lewis »

Epic is just such subjective term it would be hard to say. It does not include flaming death, a black hole or 250 ships (at least right now). :P
'Fear God and dread nought'
Coat of Arms motto of Baron Fisher, of Kilverstone
Shadow Warrior
Commander
Commander
Posts: 113
Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2008 2:40 pm

Post by Shadow Warrior »

I'm sure someone could photoshop a black hole in there somewhere.

The best (possibly only) EPIC cover I've seen on an SFU product was on the outsourced Star Fleet Warlord rulebook. A 20 strong fleet of Gorn ships sweeps into view over the edge of a planet with a starbase and defending starships lying far off in the distance.

Bizarely it lookes epic because the ships are small and distant and there is no obvious fighting going on - just a sense of menace and of a big clash about to happen. Most of the Star Fleet products seem to have a cover that consists of two giant ships blowing seven shades of manure out of each other, seemingly from a range of about 10 feet. To me that just doesn't look, well, epic.

:D
Gareth_Perkins
Captain
Captain
Posts: 242
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 11:39 am
Location: Exeter; UK

Post by Gareth_Perkins »

Why is it that in gaming circles Epic usually refers to very small things...
Gareth Lazelle
Shadow Warrior
Commander
Commander
Posts: 113
Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2008 2:40 pm

Post by Shadow Warrior »

Weird, isn't it? Here you go...

Epic...

Image



Not epic...

Image
User avatar
Charles Lewis
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 937
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2007 3:58 am
Location: Des Moines, IA
Contact:

Post by Charles Lewis »

Gareth_Perkins wrote:Why is it that in gaming circles Epic usually refers to very small things...
Because Epic was a kick-ass minis game in 6mm, hence all dudes were tiny. :P
'Fear God and dread nought'
Coat of Arms motto of Baron Fisher, of Kilverstone
Gareth_Perkins
Captain
Captain
Posts: 242
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 11:39 am
Location: Exeter; UK

Post by Gareth_Perkins »

Yes,

Warlord is a good cover - old-school but good,

Not only is Omega's cover not Epic, but it also really sucks, despite the style being newer (it also somehow really emphasizes the 2D game play of SFB, which is a personal gripe),
Because Epic was a kick-ass minis game in 6mm, hence all dudes were tiny. Razz
Pfff,

It wasn't called "Epic" in my day... And if memory serves, Epic sucked compared with the original (boy do I sound old now...)
Gareth Lazelle
User avatar
Charles Lewis
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 937
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2007 3:58 am
Location: Des Moines, IA
Contact:

Post by Charles Lewis »

Gareth_Perkins wrote:
Because Epic was a kick-ass minis game in 6mm, hence all dudes were tiny. Razz
Pfff,

It wasn't called "Epic" in my day... And if memory serves, Epic sucked compared with the original (boy do I sound old now...)
What I call "Epic" was Epic Space Marine, or the 2nd Edition of the game. All subsequent editions have blown varying degrees of chunks. :o
'Fear God and dread nought'
Coat of Arms motto of Baron Fisher, of Kilverstone
HairyHeretic
Ensign
Ensign
Posts: 22
Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 11:43 pm
Location: Ireland

Post by HairyHeretic »

I know a few guys who are quite happy with the current incarnation of Epic, and who have played at least a few editions worth.

But I recall Adeptus Titanicus, and the cut out infantry counters from White Dwarf too :D
Shadow Warrior
Commander
Commander
Posts: 113
Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2008 2:40 pm

Post by Shadow Warrior »

Gareth_Perkins wrote:Warlord is a good cover - old-school but good,

Not only is Omega's cover not Epic, but it also really sucks, despite the style being newer (it also somehow really emphlasizes the 2D game play of SFB, which is a personal gripe),
Aye, there's nothing wrong with old school.

Agreed, that Omega cover manages to make something that is actually quite exciting (the product inside the cover is pretty good and a very decent stab at making SFB a fast and fluid game) look completely the opposite.
terryoc
Lieutenant
Lieutenant
Posts: 44
Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2008 9:25 am

Post by terryoc »

The cover art for Federation Commander: Tholian Attack is actually somewhat epic. For something that doesn't have 6 millimetre tall genetically engineered supersoldiers. :P
Shadow Warrior
Commander
Commander
Posts: 113
Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2008 2:40 pm

Post by Shadow Warrior »

terryoc wrote:The cover art for Federation Commander: Tholian Attack is actually somewhat epic. For something that doesn't have 6 millimetre tall genetically engineered supersoldiers. :P
Just checked out that cover. You're right, one of the better modern covers in terms of epic-ness. The ships are still crazily close together though, but it does well in terms of depicting a bit of 3D-ness.
User avatar
mwaschak
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 854
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2007 3:43 am
Location: The data mines of VBAM
Contact:

Post by mwaschak »

TO BE RELEASED IN SPRING, 2010
SFB Module C3A Andromedan Threat File, SKU TBA, $TBA
Prime Directive Federation (GURPS, d20, d20M)
Federation Commander Briefing #3, SKU 4023, $TBA
Federation Admiral, data to be determined
Hydran Pegasus, miniature, 0912, $TBA
Squadron Box #27, SKU 4327, $34.95
Romulans PD20M, SKU 8734, $24.95
gambler
Lieutenant
Lieutenant
Posts: 30
Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2008 6:23 pm

Post by gambler »

Woohoo!

Very much looking forward to this one.
--
The cake is a lie.
Post Reply